Forum

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Attorneys hold a fiduciary relationship with their clients and are required to conduct themselves with diligence, care and expertise. But, as with all professionals attorneys make mistakes.

A mistake made by an attorney constitutes malpractice. To prove negligence in a legal sense the victim must demonstrate the duty, breach of duty, causation and damages. Let's look at each of these elements.

Duty

Medical professionals and doctors swear an oath that they will use their expertise and knowledge to treat patients, not to cause further harm. The legal right of a patient to compensation for injuries suffered due to medical malpractice is based on the notion of the duty of care. Your attorney can determine if your doctor's actions violated the duty of care and if these breaches caused you injury or illness.

To establish a duty of care, your lawyer will need to demonstrate that a medical professional had a legal relationship with you and have a fiduciary obligation to exercise an acceptable level of competence and care. To prove that the relationship existed, you may require evidence, such as your records of your doctor-patient relationship eyewitness accounts and expert testimony from doctors who have similar experience, education and training.

Your lawyer must also prove that the medical professional breached their duty of care by failing to adhere to the standards of practice that are accepted in their area of expertise. This is often known as negligence. Your lawyer will be able to compare what the defendant did with what a reasonable individual would do in the same situation.

Then, your lawyer has to show that the defendant's breach of duty directly led to the loss or injury you suffered. This is known as causation, and your lawyer will make use of evidence such as your medical reports, witness statements and expert testimony to show that the defendant's failure to meet the standard of care in your case was the direct cause of your loss or injury.

Breach

A doctor is required to perform a duty of care for his patients that reflects professional medical standards. If a doctor fails to adhere to these standards and the failure results in an injury and/or medical malpractice, then negligence can occur. Typically expert testimony from medical professionals who have similar training, expertise and certifications will help determine what the appropriate standard of care should be in a particular circumstance. State and federal laws as well as institute policies can also be used to define what doctors must perform for specific types of patients.

To win a malpractice case it is necessary to prove that the doctor violated his or his duty of care and that the breach was the direct cause of injury. This is known in legal terms as the causation factor and it is vital to prove it. For instance in the event that a damaged arm requires an xray the doctor must properly fix the arm and place it in a cast to ensure proper healing. If the doctor did not do this and the patient was left with an unavoidable loss of use of the arm, then malpractice may have occurred.

Causation

Attorney malpractice claims rely on evidence that shows the attorney's mistakes resulted in financial losses for the client. Legal malpractice claims can be brought by the victim for example, if the lawyer is unable to file a lawsuit within the statutes of limitations, which results in the case being permanently lost.

It is crucial to realize that not all mistakes by attorneys are malpractice. Strategies and Vimeo planning errors aren't usually considered to be a sign of malpractice. Attorneys have a wide range of discretion to make decisions as long as they're in the right place.

Likewise, the law gives attorneys a lot of discretion to conduct a discovery process on a client's behalf, as long as the action was not negligent or unreasonable. Legal malpractice is committed through the failure to uncover important documents or information, such as medical reports or witness statements. Other instances of malpractice could be a failure to add certain claims or defendants such as omitting to include a survival count in a case of wrongful death or the continual and extended failure to contact a client.

It is also important to consider the necessity for the plaintiff to prove that, if not due to the lawyer's negligent behavior they would have won their case. The claim of the plaintiff for malpractice is rejected if it's not proved. This makes the process of bringing legal malpractice claims complicated. It's important to choose a seasoned attorney to represent you.

Damages

To prevail in a legal malpractice case, the plaintiff must prove actual financial losses caused by the actions of the attorney. This has to be demonstrated in a lawsuit by utilizing evidence such as expert testimony, correspondence between the client and attorney as well as billing records and other documents. In addition the plaintiff must show that a reasonable lawyer would have avoided the harm that was caused by the negligence of the attorney. This is referred to as the proximate cause.

It can happen in many different ways. Some of the most common types of malpractice include failing to meet a deadline, for example, the statute of limitation, failure to conduct a conflict-check or other due diligence check on the case, not applying the law to the client's situation and breaching a fiduciary responsibility (i.e. Commingling funds from a trust account with an attorney's account as well as not communicating with the client are all examples of west palm beach malpractice law firm.

Medical malpractice lawsuits typically involve claims for compensatory damages. The compensations pay for out-of pocket expenses and losses such as hospital and medical bills, costs of equipment to aid in recovery, and lost wages. In addition, victims may be able to claim non-economic damages such as suffering and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and emotional suffering.

In a lot of legal malpractice cases there are claims for punitive and compensatory damages. The first is meant to compensate the victim for losses caused by the negligence of the attorney while the latter is designed to prevent future mistakes on the defendant's part.